Preparat vegetal pe baza de soia vs No-muh, rezent/piquant
Overall, Preparat vegetal pe baza de soia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Preparat vegetal pe baza de soia
No-muh, rezent/piquant
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Preparat vegetal pe baza de... | No-muh, rezent/piquant |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 353 kcal | 294 kcal |
| Fat | 28 g | 20 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.1 g | 12.9 g |
| Sugars | 3.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 2.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | — |
| Protein | 17 g | 7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- No-muh, rezent/piquant has 17% fewer calories (294 kcal vs 353 kcal).
- No-muh, rezent/piquant has 29% less fat (20 g vs 28 g).
- Preparat vegetal pe baza de soia has 76% less saturated fat (3.1 g vs 12.9 g).
- No-muh, rezent/piquant has 92% less sugar (0.2 g vs 3.1 g).
- Preparat vegetal pe baza de soia has 39% less salt (1.3 g vs 2.1 g).
- Preparat vegetal pe baza de soia has 59% more protein (17 g vs 7 g).
- Preparat vegetal pe baza de soia has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Preparat vegetal pe baza de soia
Not available.
No-muh, rezent/piquant
Attejnalivo zu Kase / Véo}taljen AD) Zutaten: Wasser, ntcht gehaflete pflanzltche Ole und fette (Kokos - Kartottelstarke, Hefe, Reismehl, NussmUS (100 % Stetnsaz Aroma Gewurze, Bindemjttel (Carraghenan); Milchsàure (vegetabii) eau. huiles et graisses végétales non hydre (noixde coco ftwile de tournesol). fécule de pommes de terre, levure, farine de riz, beurre de noix, sel gemme. arôme (végétal), épices, liant (carraghénane). (végétai) h#züüifssea: Die braunen Punkte slammen von Mahgeln/SteinsalZ4 Mandeln/amandes 48h
FAQ
Which is healthier: Preparat vegetal pe baza de soia or No-muh, rezent/piquant?
Overall, Preparat vegetal pe baza de soia has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
No-muh, rezent/piquant has fewer calories: 294 kcal versus 353 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
No-muh, rezent/piquant has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.