Comparison
LEGÙ 100% Vegetale vs Macco di fave
Overall, Macco di fave has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
LEGÙ 100% Vegetale
STAR Stabilimento alimentare S.p.A. · 260 g
Better choice 
Macco di fave
Terre di Arena · 200g
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | LEGÙ 100% Vegetale | Macco di fave |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 115 kcal | 109 kcal |
| Fat | 6.4 g | 3.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 4.2 g | 2.4 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 2.8 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 6.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Macco di fave has 42% less fat (3.7 g vs 6.4 g).
- Macco di fave has 44% less sugar (2.4 g vs 4.2 g).
- Macco di fave has 85% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
- LEGÙ 100% Vegetale has 100% more fiber (2.8 g vs 0 g).
- Macco di fave has 43% more protein (6.3 g vs 3.6 g).
- Macco di fave has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
LEGÙ 100% Vegetale
Not available.
Macco di fave
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: LEGÙ 100% Vegetale or Macco di fave?
Overall, Macco di fave has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Macco di fave has fewer calories: 109 kcal versus 115 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Macco di fave has less sugar: 2.4 g versus 4.2 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
LEGÙ 100% Vegetale vs Sugo alla norma
LEGÙ 100% Vegetale vs Salsa pronta di pomodoro...
LEGÙ 100% Vegetale vs Pesto cavolo riccio
Pesto cavolo riccio vs Macco di fave
LEGÙ 100% Vegetale vs Ragù di cinghiale
Ragù di cinghiale vs Macco di fave
Sugo Amatriciana Italiam... vs LEGÙ 100% Vegetale
Sugo Amatriciana Italiam... vs Macco di fave