Comparison

Le supérieur cuit à l'étouffée - 4tr. vs Ángulo

Overall, Ángulo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLe supérieur cuit à l'étouff...Ángulo
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 117 kcal 76 kcal
Fat 2.8 g 5 g
Saturated fat 1 g 3.5 g
Sugars 0.7 g 1.8 g
Salt 1.8 g 0.3 g
Fiber 0.3 g —
Protein 22 g 6 g
Additives20
AllergensCeleryMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Ángulo has 35% fewer calories (76 kcal vs 117 kcal).
  • Le supérieur cuit à l'étouffée - 4tr. has 44% less fat (2.8 g vs 5 g).
  • Le supérieur cuit à l'étouffée - 4tr. has 71% less saturated fat (1 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Le supérieur cuit à l'étouffée - 4tr. has 61% less sugar (0.7 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Ángulo has 86% less salt (0.3 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Le supérieur cuit à l'étouffée - 4tr. has 73% more protein (22 g vs 6 g).
  • Ángulo has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Ángulo is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Le supérieur cuit à l'étouffée - 4tr. lists: Celery.
  • Only Ángulo lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Le supérieur cuit à l'étouffée - 4tr.

Jambon de porc, sel, bouillon de légumes (eau, _céleri_, carotte, jus concentré de _céleri_, oignon, poireau), fond de porc (eau, os de porc, viande de porc, épices), dextrose de maïs, antioxydant : ascorbate de sodium, conservateur : nitrite de sodium.

Ángulo

leche pasterizada de vaca cuajo y sal. Origen de la leche: España.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Le supérieur cuit à l'étouffée - 4tr. or Ángulo?

Overall, Ángulo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Ángulo has fewer calories: 76 kcal versus 117 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Le supérieur cuit à l'étouffée - 4tr. has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons