Rôti de Porc - 100% Filet** - BIO vs Ángulo
Overall, Ángulo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rôti de Porc - 100% Filet**... | Ángulo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 129 kcal | 76 kcal |
| Fat | 3.8 g | 5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.4 g | 3.5 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 23 g | 6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Celery | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ángulo has 41% fewer calories (76 kcal vs 129 kcal).
- Rôti de Porc - 100% Filet** - BIO has 24% less fat (3.8 g vs 5 g).
- Rôti de Porc - 100% Filet** - BIO has 60% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 3.5 g).
- Rôti de Porc - 100% Filet** - BIO has 61% less sugar (0.7 g vs 1.8 g).
- Ángulo has 86% less salt (0.3 g vs 1.8 g).
- Rôti de Porc - 100% Filet** - BIO has 74% more protein (23 g vs 6 g).
- Ángulo has the better Nutri-Score.
- Ángulo is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Rôti de Porc - 100% Filet** - BIO lists: Celery.
- Only Ángulo lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Rôti de Porc - 100% Filet** - BIO
Filet de porc*, sel, jus concentrés (acérola*, carotte*, _céleri_*, oignon*), caramel* (sucre*, eau), ail*, sucre de canne*, poivre* 0.1%, maltodextrine*, ferments. *Ingrédients issus de l'agriculture biologique.
Ángulo
leche pasterizada de vaca cuajo y sal. Origen de la leche: España.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rôti de Porc - 100% Filet** - BIO or Ángulo?
Overall, Ángulo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ángulo has fewer calories: 76 kcal versus 129 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rôti de Porc - 100% Filet** - BIO has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.