Le Fumé Jambon au bois de hêtre vs Jambon Le Fumé sans couenne - 2 tr.
Overall, Jambon Le Fumé sans couenne - 2 tr. has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Le Fumé Jambon au bois de hêtre
Jambon Le Fumé sans couenne - 2 tr.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Le Fumé Jambon au bois de hê... | Jambon Le Fumé sans couenne... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 111 kcal | 115 kcal |
| Fat | 3 g | 2.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.5 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 20 g | 22 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Celery |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Jambon Le Fumé sans couenne - 2 tr. has 33% less saturated fat (1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Jambon Le Fumé sans couenne - 2 tr. has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Only Jambon Le Fumé sans couenne - 2 tr. lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Le Fumé Jambon au bois de hêtre
Jambon de porc, sel, arômes naturels, dextrose, bouillon de port déshydraté, antioxydant : érythorbate de sodium, conservateur : nitrite de sodium.
Jambon Le Fumé sans couenne - 2 tr.
Jambon de porc, bouillons (eau, os de porc, viande de porc, _céleri_, carotte, jus concentré de _céleri_, oignon, poireau, épices), sel, dextrose de maïs, antioxydant : ascorbate de sodium, conservateur : nitrite de sodium.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Le Fumé Jambon au bois de hêtre or Jambon Le Fumé sans couenne - 2 tr.?
Overall, Jambon Le Fumé sans couenne - 2 tr. has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Le Fumé Jambon au bois de hêtre has fewer calories: 111 kcal versus 115 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Jambon Le Fumé sans couenne - 2 tr. has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.