Lachsforellenfilet mit Haut vs Regenbogenforellen Filets
Overall, Regenbogenforellen Filets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Lachsforellenfilet mit Haut
Regenbogenforellen Filets
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lachsforellenfilet mit Haut | Regenbogenforellen Filets |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 155 kcal | 122 kcal |
| Fat | 9.3 g | 5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.1 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Regenbogenforellen Filets has 21% fewer calories (122 kcal vs 155 kcal).
- Regenbogenforellen Filets has 46% less fat (5 g vs 9.3 g).
- Regenbogenforellen Filets has 52% less saturated fat (1 g vs 2.1 g).
Ingredients
Lachsforellenfilet mit Haut
Lachsforellenfilet.
Regenbogenforellen Filets
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lachsforellenfilet mit Haut or Regenbogenforellen Filets?
Overall, Regenbogenforellen Filets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Regenbogenforellen Filets has fewer calories: 122 kcal versus 155 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lachsforellenfilet mit Haut has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.