Comparison

Lachsforellenfilet mit Haut vs Lachsforelle

Overall, Lachsforellenfilet mit Haut has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientLachsforellenfilet mit HautLachsforelle
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group — —
Calories 155 kcal 148 kcal
Fat 9.3 g 8 g
Saturated fat 2.1 g 1.4 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0.1 g 2.3 g
Protein 18 g 19 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Lachsforelle has 14% less fat (8 g vs 9.3 g).
  • Lachsforelle has 33% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Lachsforellenfilet mit Haut has 97% less salt (0.1 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Lachsforellenfilet mit Haut has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Lachsforellenfilet mit Haut

Lachsforellenfilet.

Lachsforelle

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Lachsforellenfilet mit Haut or Lachsforelle?

Overall, Lachsforellenfilet mit Haut has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Lachsforelle has fewer calories: 148 kcal versus 155 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Lachsforellenfilet mit Haut has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons