Lachsforellenfilet mit Haut vs Lachsforelle
Overall, Lachsforellenfilet mit Haut has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lachsforellenfilet mit Haut | Lachsforelle |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 155 kcal | 148 kcal |
| Fat | 9.3 g | 8 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.1 g | 1.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 2.3 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lachsforelle has 14% less fat (8 g vs 9.3 g).
- Lachsforelle has 33% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 2.1 g).
- Lachsforellenfilet mit Haut has 97% less salt (0.1 g vs 2.3 g).
- Lachsforellenfilet mit Haut has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Lachsforellenfilet mit Haut
Lachsforellenfilet.
Lachsforelle
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lachsforellenfilet mit Haut or Lachsforelle?
Overall, Lachsforellenfilet mit Haut has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lachsforelle has fewer calories: 148 kcal versus 155 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lachsforellenfilet mit Haut has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.