Lachsburger paniert vs Hamburguesas de salmón y merluza
Overall, Lachsburger paniert has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Lachsburger paniert
Hamburguesas de salmón y merluza
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lachsburger paniert | Hamburguesas de salmón y mer... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 235 kcal | 165 kcal |
| Fat | 10.1 g | 10.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 1.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 12.3 g | 12.6 g |
| Additives | 5 | 4 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hamburguesas de salmón y merluza has 30% fewer calories (165 kcal vs 235 kcal).
- Lachsburger paniert has no saturated fat, while Hamburguesas de salmón y merluza has 1.4 g.
- Lachsburger paniert has no sugar, while Hamburguesas de salmón y merluza has 0.9 g.
- Only Lachsburger paniert lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Lachsburger paniert
60% burger de saumon (73,6% saumon de l'Atlantique hachée, farine de blé, échalotes, fibres de blé, stabilisant: citrates de sodium; épices (ail en poudre, poivre blanc), herbes (échalotes), sel de cuisine, dextrose, levure, antioxydant: acide citrique), 40% pâte à frire (farine de blé, farine de maïs, eau, huile de colza, amidon modifié, sel de cuisine, poudre à lever: carbonate de sodium; épices, oignons en poudre). Saumon Atlantique (Salmo salar) issues de l'aquaculture intensive en A*) Norvège, B*) Chili ou C*) Ecosse.
Hamburguesas de salmón y merluza
Salmón (Salmo salar) (419%), merluza del por 100 g Cabo (Merluccius capensis, Merluccius paradoxus) (38%), agua, aceite de girasol, harina de arroz, fibras vegetales, fécula de patata, sal, estabilizantes (E-407a, E-451), correctores de acidez (E-331ll, E-325), especias, antioxidante (E-301) y proteína de guisante.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lachsburger paniert or Hamburguesas de salmón y merluza?
Overall, Lachsburger paniert has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hamburguesas de salmón y merluza has fewer calories: 165 kcal versus 235 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lachsburger paniert has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.