Kyllingbacon vs Zwan Chicken Luncheon Meat
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kyllingbacon | Zwan Chicken Luncheon Meat |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 204 kcal | 211 kcal |
| Fat | 10.1 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.8 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.3 g | 7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 22.4 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 6 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kyllingbacon has 33% less fat (10.1 g vs 15 g).
- Zwan Chicken Luncheon Meat has no saturated fat, while Kyllingbacon has 2.8 g.
- Kyllingbacon has 81% less sugar (1.3 g vs 7 g).
- Kyllingbacon has 46% more protein (22.4 g vs 12 g).
- Zwan Chicken Luncheon Meat has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Zwan Chicken Luncheon Meat lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Kyllingbacon
Kylling lårkjøtt (93 %), vann, stivelse (potetmel), salt, aroma, dekstrose, røykaroma, konserveringsmiddel e250, e261, e326, stabilisator e450, e451, antioksidant e315. røkt på bøkeflis.
Zwan Chicken Luncheon Meat
Viande de poulet 81 %, eau, amidon de blé, sel, stabilisant : phosphate de sodium, épices, protéine de maïs hydrolysée, exhausteur de goût : glutamate monosodique, antioxydant : érythorbate de sodium, dextrose, conservateur : nitrite de sodium.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kyllingbacon or Zwan Chicken Luncheon Meat?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kyllingbacon has fewer calories: 204 kcal versus 211 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kyllingbacon has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 7 g per 100 g.