Krokant Riegel Sesam vs Caramel Sesam Riegel Von Ivanka In Der 60g Packung
Overall, Krokant Riegel Sesam has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Krokant Riegel Sesam
Caramel Sesam Riegel Von Ivanka In Der 60g Packung
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Krokant Riegel Sesam | Caramel Sesam Riegel Von Iva... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 496 kcal | 566 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 34.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.4 g | 5.9 g |
| Sugars | 31 g | 26.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 8.2 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 14.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sesame seeds | Sesame seeds |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Krokant Riegel Sesam has 12% fewer calories (496 kcal vs 566 kcal).
- Krokant Riegel Sesam has 28% less fat (25 g vs 34.6 g).
- Krokant Riegel Sesam has 25% less saturated fat (4.4 g vs 5.9 g).
- Caramel Sesam Riegel Von Ivanka In Der 60g Packung has 15% less sugar (26.5 g vs 31 g).
- Krokant Riegel Sesam has 100% more fiber (8.2 g vs 0 g).
- Krokant Riegel Sesam has the better Nutri-Score.
- Krokant Riegel Sesam is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Krokant Riegel Sesam
51% SESAM, Reissirup*, Rohrohrzucker*. *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft Kann Spuren von Erdnüssen enthalten.
Caramel Sesam Riegel Von Ivanka In Der 60g Packung
Sésame 60 % , sucre, sirop de glucose
FAQ
Which is healthier: Krokant Riegel Sesam or Caramel Sesam Riegel Von Ivanka In Der 60g Packung?
Overall, Krokant Riegel Sesam has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Krokant Riegel Sesam has fewer calories: 496 kcal versus 566 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Caramel Sesam Riegel Von Ivanka In Der 60g Packung has less sugar: 26.5 g versus 31 g per 100 g.