Comparison
Kouglof vs Kouglof White noir
Overall, Kouglof has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kouglof | Kouglof White noir |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 208 kcal | 475 kcal |
| Fat | 8.4 g | 26 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.9 g | 9.5 g |
| Sugars | 21 g | 35 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 4.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kouglof has 56% fewer calories (208 kcal vs 475 kcal).
- Kouglof has 68% less fat (8.4 g vs 26 g).
- Kouglof has 48% less saturated fat (4.9 g vs 9.5 g).
- Kouglof has 40% less sugar (21 g vs 35 g).
- Kouglof White noir has 12% more protein (4.1 g vs 3.6 g).
- Kouglof has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Kouglof
Not available.
Kouglof White noir
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kouglof or Kouglof White noir?
Overall, Kouglof has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kouglof has fewer calories: 208 kcal versus 475 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kouglof has less sugar: 21 g versus 35 g per 100 g.