Comparison
Kouglof vs Kouglof Marble
Overall, Kouglof has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kouglof | Kouglof Marble |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 208 kcal | 454 kcal |
| Fat | 8.4 g | 25.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.9 g | 3.1 g |
| Sugars | 21 g | 23.4 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kouglof has 54% fewer calories (208 kcal vs 454 kcal).
- Kouglof has 67% less fat (8.4 g vs 25.7 g).
- Kouglof Marble has 37% less saturated fat (3.1 g vs 4.9 g).
- Kouglof has 10% less sugar (21 g vs 23.4 g).
- Kouglof has 78% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
- Kouglof Marble has 40% more protein (6 g vs 3.6 g).
Ingredients
Kouglof
Not available.
Kouglof Marble
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kouglof or Kouglof Marble?
Overall, Kouglof has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kouglof has fewer calories: 208 kcal versus 454 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kouglof has less sugar: 21 g versus 23.4 g per 100 g.