Comparison
Kombu Royal vs Kombu
Overall, Kombu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kombu Royal | Kombu |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 154 kcal | 144 kcal |
| Fat | 2.6 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 24.2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 6.5 g | 6.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 32.7 g |
| Protein | 8.4 g | 7.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kombu Royal has 13% less fat (2.6 g vs 3 g).
- Kombu Royal has 33% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 1.1 g).
- Kombu has no sugar, while Kombu Royal has 24.2 g.
- Kombu has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Kombu Royal
Not available.
Kombu
BIOLOGISCH GEDROOGD ZEEWIER (Laminaria japonica)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kombu Royal or Kombu?
Overall, Kombu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kombu has fewer calories: 144 kcal versus 154 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kombu has less sugar: 0 g versus 24.2 g per 100 g.