Comparison
Kombu Royal vs Alga Kombu
Overall, Alga Kombu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kombu Royal | Alga Kombu |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 154 kcal | 113 kcal |
| Fat | 2.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 24.2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 6.5 g | 5.1 g |
| Protein | 8.4 g | 9.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Alga Kombu has 27% fewer calories (113 kcal vs 154 kcal).
- Alga Kombu has 81% less fat (0.5 g vs 2.6 g).
- Alga Kombu has 86% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
- Alga Kombu has no sugar, while Kombu Royal has 24.2 g.
- Alga Kombu has 22% less salt (5.1 g vs 6.5 g).
Ingredients
Kombu Royal
Not available.
Alga Kombu
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kombu Royal or Alga Kombu?
Overall, Alga Kombu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Alga Kombu has fewer calories: 113 kcal versus 154 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Alga Kombu has less sugar: 0 g versus 24.2 g per 100 g.