Kombu Royal vs Algues déshydratées
Overall, Algues déshydratées has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kombu Royal | Algues déshydratées |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 154 kcal | 157 kcal |
| Fat | 2.6 g | 1.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 24.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 6.5 g | 9 g |
| Protein | 8.4 g | 11.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Crustaceans, Fish, Molluscs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Algues déshydratées has 54% less fat (1.2 g vs 2.6 g).
- Algues déshydratées has 72% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 0.7 g).
- Algues déshydratées has 98% less sugar (0.5 g vs 24.2 g).
- Kombu Royal has 28% less salt (6.5 g vs 9 g).
- Algues déshydratées has 28% more protein (11.7 g vs 8.4 g).
- Only Algues déshydratées lists: Crustaceans, Fish, Molluscs.
Ingredients
Kombu Royal
Not available.
Algues déshydratées
Kombu royal (Saccharina latissima). Traces possibles de : coquillage, crustacé, poisson, mollusque
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kombu Royal or Algues déshydratées?
Overall, Algues déshydratées has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kombu Royal has fewer calories: 154 kcal versus 157 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Algues déshydratées has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 24.2 g per 100 g.