Comparison

Algues déshydratées vs Kombu

Overall, Kombu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientAlgues déshydratéesKombu
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 157 kcal 144 kcal
Fat 1.2 g 3 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 1.1 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0 g
Salt 9 g 6.5 g
Fiber — 32.7 g
Protein 11.7 g 7.8 g
Additives00
AllergensCrustaceans, Fish, MolluscsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Algues déshydratées has 60% less fat (1.2 g vs 3 g).
  • Algues déshydratées has 81% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Kombu has no sugar, while Algues déshydratées has 0.5 g.
  • Kombu has 28% less salt (6.5 g vs 9 g).
  • Algues déshydratées has 33% more protein (11.7 g vs 7.8 g).
  • Kombu has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Algues déshydratées lists: Crustaceans, Fish, Molluscs.

Ingredients

Algues déshydratées

Kombu royal (Saccharina latissima). Traces possibles de : coquillage, crustacé, poisson, mollusque

Kombu

BIOLOGISCH GEDROOGD ZEEWIER (Laminaria japonica)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Algues déshydratées or Kombu?

Overall, Kombu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kombu has fewer calories: 144 kcal versus 157 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kombu has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons