Comparison
Kokosraspeln vs Coco Desidratado com Cacau e Sal Marinho
Overall, Kokosraspeln has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kokosraspeln | Coco Desidratado com Cacau e... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 635 kcal | 629 kcal |
| Fat | 59 g | 53.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 55.7 g | 48 g |
| Sugars | 7.6 g | 16.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 16.3 g | 9.9 g |
| Protein | 6.7 g | 7.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Coco Desidratado com Cacau e Sal Marinho has 14% less saturated fat (48 g vs 55.7 g).
- Kokosraspeln has 53% less sugar (7.6 g vs 16.2 g).
- Kokosraspeln has 91% less salt (0 g vs 0.3 g).
- Kokosraspeln has 39% more fiber (16.3 g vs 9.9 g).
- Coco Desidratado com Cacau e Sal Marinho has 13% more protein (7.7 g vs 6.7 g).
- Kokosraspeln has the better Nutri-Score.
- Kokosraspeln is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Kokosraspeln
Kokosraspel
Coco Desidratado com Cacau e Sal Marinho
Lascas de cocô (78%), Xarope de cocô (15%), Cacau em pó (6%), Sal marinho (1%).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kokosraspeln or Coco Desidratado com Cacau e Sal Marinho?
Overall, Kokosraspeln has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Coco Desidratado com Cacau e Sal Marinho has fewer calories: 629 kcal versus 635 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kokosraspeln has less sugar: 7.6 g versus 16.2 g per 100 g.