Comparison

Kokosmilch cremig vs Pork Puffs

Overall, Kokosmilch cremig has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKokosmilch cremigPork Puffs
Nutri-Score c e
NOVA group 1 3
Calories 185 kcal 532 kcal
Fat 18 g 27.8 g
Saturated fat 16.3 g 9.9 g
Sugars 1.6 g 0.1 g
Salt 0.1 g 5.8 g
Fiber 5.9 g 0.7 g
Protein 1.3 g 71.1 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kokosmilch cremig has 65% fewer calories (185 kcal vs 532 kcal).
  • Kokosmilch cremig has 35% less fat (18 g vs 27.8 g).
  • Pork Puffs has 39% less saturated fat (9.9 g vs 16.3 g).
  • Pork Puffs has 94% less sugar (0.1 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Kokosmilch cremig has 99% less salt (0.1 g vs 5.8 g).
  • Kokosmilch cremig has 88% more fiber (5.9 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Pork Puffs has 98% more protein (71.1 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Kokosmilch cremig has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Kokosmilch cremig is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Kokosmilch cremig

Kokosnussfruchtfleisch 65%, Wasser

Pork Puffs

Pork Rind (95%), Salt, Yeast Extract.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kokosmilch cremig or Pork Puffs?

Overall, Kokosmilch cremig has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kokosmilch cremig has fewer calories: 185 kcal versus 532 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pork Puffs has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 1.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons