Kipfilet met chilipeper vs Kipfilet
Overall, Kipfilet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kipfilet met chilipeper | Kipfilet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 136 kcal | 126 kcal |
| Fat | 5.2 g | 4.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.6 g | 1.4 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 5 | 6 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kipfilet has 13% less fat (4.5 g vs 5.2 g).
- Kipfilet has 45% less sugar (1.2 g vs 2.2 g).
- Kipfilet has 11% more protein (19 g vs 17 g).
- Kipfilet has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Kipfilet met chilipeper
86% kippenvlees, water, zuurteregelaar (kaliumacetaat [e261], kaliumlactaat [e3261, natriumcitraat [e3311), zout, kaliumchloride (dieetzout), dextrose, suiker, aroma, natuurlijk aroma, rookaroma, stabilisator (carrageen [e407]), antioxidant (natriumascorbaat [e301]), tomatenpoeder, specerijen (o.a. chili), extract van paprika, conserveermiddel (natriumnitriet [e250]).
Kipfilet
86% KIPPENVLEES, WATER, ZUURTEREGELAAR (KALIUMLACTAAT (E326], KALIUMACETATEN [E2611), ZCUT, NATUURLIJK AROMA, STABILISATOR (DIFOSFATEN [E450], CARRAGEEN [E4071), DEXTROSE, KALIUMCHLORIDE (DIEETZOUT), AROMA, SUIKER, WITTE PEPER, ANTIOXIDANT (NATRIUMASCORBAAT [E301]), CONSERVEERMIDDEL CNATRIUMNITRIET [E250]), ROOKAROMA. 1 tonnUBL
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kipfilet met chilipeper or Kipfilet?
Overall, Kipfilet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kipfilet has fewer calories: 126 kcal versus 136 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kipfilet has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.