Marcassou Marcachouffe zonder look bel vs Kipfilet met chilipeper
Overall, Kipfilet met chilipeper has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Marcassou Marcachouffe zonder look bel
Kipfilet met chilipeper
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Marcassou Marcachouffe zonde... | Kipfilet met chilipeper |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 442 kcal | 136 kcal |
| Fat | 36 g | 5.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 14 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 3.5 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 3.9 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.2 g |
| Protein | 26 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 2 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kipfilet met chilipeper has 69% fewer calories (136 kcal vs 442 kcal).
- Kipfilet met chilipeper has 86% less fat (5.2 g vs 36 g).
- Kipfilet met chilipeper has 89% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 14 g).
- Kipfilet met chilipeper has 37% less sugar (2.2 g vs 3.5 g).
- Kipfilet met chilipeper has 50% less salt (1.9 g vs 3.9 g).
- Marcassou Marcachouffe zonder look bel has 35% more protein (26 g vs 17 g).
- Kipfilet met chilipeper has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Marcassou Marcachouffe zonder look bel
pork meat, salt, maltodextrin, dextrose, spices, aromatic plants, dye: natural mealybug, antioxidant: sodium ascorbate, preservative: sodium nitrite, ferments, smoke,
Kipfilet met chilipeper
86% kippenvlees, water, zuurteregelaar (kaliumacetaat [e261], kaliumlactaat [e3261, natriumcitraat [e3311), zout, kaliumchloride (dieetzout), dextrose, suiker, aroma, natuurlijk aroma, rookaroma, stabilisator (carrageen [e407]), antioxidant (natriumascorbaat [e301]), tomatenpoeder, specerijen (o.a. chili), extract van paprika, conserveermiddel (natriumnitriet [e250]).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Marcassou Marcachouffe zonder look bel or Kipfilet met chilipeper?
Overall, Kipfilet met chilipeper has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kipfilet met chilipeper has fewer calories: 136 kcal versus 442 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kipfilet met chilipeper has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.