Kipfilet vs Kalkoenfilet
Overall, Kalkoenfilet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kipfilet | Kalkoenfilet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 126 kcal | 107 kcal |
| Fat | 4.5 g | 2.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.4 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 5 g |
| Fiber | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 6 | 7 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kalkoenfilet has 15% fewer calories (107 kcal vs 126 kcal).
- Kalkoenfilet has 36% less fat (2.9 g vs 4.5 g).
- Kalkoenfilet has 36% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 1.4 g).
- Kalkoenfilet has 42% less sugar (0.7 g vs 1.2 g).
- Kipfilet has 65% less salt (1.8 g vs 5 g).
- Kipfilet has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Kipfilet
86% KIPPENVLEES, WATER, ZUURTEREGELAAR (KALIUMLACTAAT (E326], KALIUMACETATEN [E2611), ZCUT, NATUURLIJK AROMA, STABILISATOR (DIFOSFATEN [E450], CARRAGEEN [E4071), DEXTROSE, KALIUMCHLORIDE (DIEETZOUT), AROMA, SUIKER, WITTE PEPER, ANTIOXIDANT (NATRIUMASCORBAAT [E301]), CONSERVEERMIDDEL CNATRIUMNITRIET [E250]), ROOKAROMA. 1 tonnUBL
Kalkoenfilet
81% kalkoenvlees, water, zuurteregelaar (E261, E325, E326, E331), zout, dextrose, kaliumchloride (dieetzout), suiker, natuurlijk aroma, antioxidant (E301), stabilisator (E407), conserveermiddel (E250).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kipfilet or Kalkoenfilet?
Overall, Kalkoenfilet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kalkoenfilet has fewer calories: 107 kcal versus 126 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kalkoenfilet has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.