Comparison

Kipfilet vs Achterham

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKipfiletAchterham
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 126 kcal 102 kcal
Fat 4.5 g 2.1 g
Saturated fat 1.4 g 0.8 g
Sugars 1.2 g 0.6 g
Salt 1.8 g 2.3 g
Fiber 0.3 g 0.1 g
Protein 19 g 16 g
Additives68
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Achterham has 19% fewer calories (102 kcal vs 126 kcal).
  • Achterham has 53% less fat (2.1 g vs 4.5 g).
  • Achterham has 43% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Achterham has 50% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Kipfilet has 21% less salt (1.8 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Kipfilet has 16% more protein (19 g vs 16 g).
  • Kipfilet has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Kipfilet

86% KIPPENVLEES, WATER, ZUURTEREGELAAR (KALIUMLACTAAT (E326], KALIUMACETATEN [E2611), ZCUT, NATUURLIJK AROMA, STABILISATOR (DIFOSFATEN [E450], CARRAGEEN [E4071), DEXTROSE, KALIUMCHLORIDE (DIEETZOUT), AROMA, SUIKER, WITTE PEPER, ANTIOXIDANT (NATRIUMASCORBAAT [E301]), CONSERVEERMIDDEL CNATRIUMNITRIET [E250]), ROOKAROMA. 1 tonnUBL

Achterham

78% VARKENSVLEES, WATER, ZUURTEREGELAAR (KALIUMACETATEN [E261], KALIUMLACTAAT [E326]), ZOUT, NATUURLIJKE AROMA'S, AARDAPPELZETMEEL, GLUCOSESTROOP, AROMA, DEXTROSE, STABILISATOR (CARRAGEEN [E407], DIFOSFATEN [E450], TRIFOSFATEN (E451), POLYFOSFATEN [E452]), GISTEXTRACT, ANTIOXIDANT (NATRIUMASCORBAAT [E301]), CONSERVEERMIDDEL (NATRIUMNITRIET (E250]), ROOK.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kipfilet or Achterham?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Achterham has fewer calories: 102 kcal versus 126 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Achterham has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons