Comparison

King Prawns vs Prawn cocktail

Overall, King Prawns has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKing PrawnsPrawn cocktail
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group — 3
Calories 75 kcal 285 kcal
Fat 0.5 g 25.7 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 2.8 g
Sugars 0.5 g 2.2 g
Salt 1.5 g 1.2 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0.7 g
Protein 17.4 g 10 g
Additives00
AllergensCrustaceansCrustaceans, Eggs, Milk, Mustard

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • King Prawns has 74% fewer calories (75 kcal vs 285 kcal).
  • King Prawns has 98% less fat (0.5 g vs 25.7 g).
  • King Prawns has 96% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 2.8 g).
  • King Prawns has 77% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.2 g).
  • King Prawns has 43% more protein (17.4 g vs 10 g).
  • King Prawns has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Prawn cocktail lists: Eggs, Milk, Mustard.

Ingredients

King Prawns

King prawns (Penaeus vannamel) (crustaceans) (99%), salt

Prawn cocktail

Prawn (Crustacean) (54%), Rapeseed Oil, Double Cream (Milk), Pasteurised Egg Yolk, Sugar, Salt, Tomato Paste, Brandy, Sherry, Worcestershire Sauce [Water, Sugar, Spirit Vinegar, Molasses, Onion Purée, Salt, Tamarind Paste, Clove, Ginger Purée, Garlic Puréel, Spirit Vinegar, Concentrated Lemon Juice, Cornflour, Mustard Flour, White Pepper. Made using prawns caught in the North-West Atlantic and NE Atlantic - Iceland. Allergy Advice For allergens, see ingredients in bold. Also, may contain fish and molluscs. 10 1178 285k Fat 25

FAQ

Which is healthier: King Prawns or Prawn cocktail?

Overall, King Prawns has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

King Prawns has fewer calories: 75 kcal versus 285 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

King Prawns has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons