Kim-Chi vs Red cabbage
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kim-Chi | Red cabbage |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 15 kcal | 61 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 2.6 g | 13 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | — | 2.2 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kim-Chi has 75% fewer calories (15 kcal vs 61 kcal).
- Kim-Chi has 80% less sugar (2.6 g vs 13 g).
- Red cabbage has 26% less salt (1.4 g vs 1.9 g).
- Red cabbage has 40% more protein (1 g vs 0.6 g).
Ingredients
Kim-Chi
Chinese cabbage, chill, garli,sat (RU) Kапуста по-корейски "Ким-чи"оригинал. Состав: китайская капуста, перец чеснок, соль, кориандр, консервант: сорбат калия. При температуре + 2"СдО -+/С фи ГОдноСТи до: СМ. обод. Koriander, Konservierungsstoff: Kaliumsorbat. Bei +2°C bis +7°C mindestens haltbar bis: siehe Rand. preferentemente antes del: ver margen. veja margem. (Hergestellt in
Red cabbage
chou rouge 77,7%, sucre, eau, pommes, sel, vinaigre d'alcool, épices,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kim-Chi or Red cabbage?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kim-Chi has fewer calories: 15 kcal versus 61 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kim-Chi has less sugar: 2.6 g versus 13 g per 100 g.