Comparison
Kidney-Bohnen vs Alubia granja
Overall, Kidney-Bohnen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kidney-Bohnen | Alubia granja |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 73 kcal | 74 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 5.7 g | 5.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kidney-Bohnen has 38% less salt (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Kidney-Bohnen has 11% more protein (5.7 g vs 5.1 g).
- Kidney-Bohnen has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Alubia granja lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Kidney-Bohnen
Kidney-Bohnen, Wasser, Zucker, Speisesalz
Alubia granja
Alubias granja, agua, sal, antioxidantes (_disulfito sódico_, E385).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kidney-Bohnen or Alubia granja?
Overall, Kidney-Bohnen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kidney-Bohnen has fewer calories: 73 kcal versus 74 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Alubia granja has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.