Kichererbsen vs Coppola Pomodoro San Marzano
Overall, Kichererbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kichererbsen | Coppola Pomodoro San Marzano |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 101 kcal | 22 kcal |
| Fat | 1.7 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 5.7 g | 1.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Coppola Pomodoro San Marzano has 78% fewer calories (22 kcal vs 101 kcal).
- Coppola Pomodoro San Marzano has 94% less fat (0.1 g vs 1.7 g).
- Kichererbsen has 14% less sugar (3 g vs 3.5 g).
- Kichererbsen has 72% more fiber (3.6 g vs 1 g).
- Kichererbsen has 79% more protein (5.7 g vs 1.2 g).
Ingredients
Kichererbsen
Bio Kichererbsen 66%, Wasser, Meersalz
Coppola Pomodoro San Marzano
Whole peeled tomatoes (60%), Tomato juice, salt.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kichererbsen or Coppola Pomodoro San Marzano?
Overall, Kichererbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Coppola Pomodoro San Marzano has fewer calories: 22 kcal versus 101 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kichererbsen has less sugar: 3 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.