Comparison

Kerala Banana Chips vs Plantain chips salted

Overall, Kerala Banana Chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKerala Banana ChipsPlantain chips salted
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 519 kcal 546 kcal
Fat 27.5 g 33 g
Saturated fat 12.7 g 13.4 g
Sugars 6.2 g 1.3 g
Salt 0.4 g 0.3 g
Fiber 6.9 g 3.8 g
Protein 6.8 g 1.3 g
Additives50
AllergensMilk, Mustard, Soybeans, Milk solidsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kerala Banana Chips has 17% less fat (27.5 g vs 33 g).
  • Plantain chips salted has 79% less sugar (1.3 g vs 6.2 g).
  • Kerala Banana Chips has 45% more fiber (6.9 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Kerala Banana Chips has 81% more protein (6.8 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Plantain chips salted is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Kerala Banana Chips lists: Milk, Mustard, Soybeans, Milk solids.

Ingredients

Kerala Banana Chips

Raw Banana (72%) Refined vegetable oil (Palmolein), iodised Salt, Spices and Condiments (Chilli, Garlic, Onion, Tamarind), Sugar, Rice powder, Hydrolysed Vegetable protein, dehydrated herbs, Acidity regulator (E330), Anticaking agent (E551), Flavour Enhancers (E627, E631),Antioxidant (E319),natural colors,natural and natural identical flavoring substances, _soy_,_milk solids_,_Mustard_

Plantain chips salted

Plantains (70%), non-hydrogenated vegetable oil (palmolein)*, sea salt (1%).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kerala Banana Chips or Plantain chips salted?

Overall, Kerala Banana Chips has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kerala Banana Chips has fewer calories: 519 kcal versus 546 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Plantain chips salted has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 6.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons