Comparison

Kartoffelpuffer vs Bio-Kartoffelpuffer mit Süßkartoffeln

Overall, Bio-Kartoffelpuffer mit Süßkartoffeln has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKartoffelpufferBio-Kartoffelpuffer mit Süßk...
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 132 kcal 183 kcal
Fat 3 g 8 g
Saturated fat 1.7 g 0.8 g
Sugars 1.1 g 1.5 g
Salt 1.1 g 1.3 g
Fiber 1.2 g 2 g
Protein 2.4 g 3.5 g
Additives20
AllergensEggs, GlutenEggs, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kartoffelpuffer has 28% fewer calories (132 kcal vs 183 kcal).
  • Kartoffelpuffer has 63% less fat (3 g vs 8 g).
  • Bio-Kartoffelpuffer mit Süßkartoffeln has 53% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Kartoffelpuffer has 27% less sugar (1.1 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Bio-Kartoffelpuffer mit Süßkartoffeln has 39% more fiber (2 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Bio-Kartoffelpuffer mit Süßkartoffeln has 31% more protein (3.5 g vs 2.4 g).
  • Bio-Kartoffelpuffer mit Süßkartoffeln is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Kartoffelpuffer

Kartoffeln, Kartoffelstärke, Palmöl, VOLLEIPULVER, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumjodat), WEIZENMEHL, Verdickungsmittel (Guarkernmehl, Xanthan), Traubenzucker, Gewürz, Gewürzextrakt.

Bio-Kartoffelpuffer mit Süßkartoffeln

Kartoffeln 79,5%, Süßkartoffeln 18%, Rapsöl, Zwiebeln, Kartoffelstärke, _Haferflocken_, _Volleipulver_, Salz, Gewürze

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kartoffelpuffer or Bio-Kartoffelpuffer mit Süßkartoffeln?

Overall, Bio-Kartoffelpuffer mit Süßkartoffeln has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kartoffelpuffer has fewer calories: 132 kcal versus 183 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kartoffelpuffer has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons