Comparison

Kalamata olives vs Paté di olive taggiasche

Overall, Kalamata olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientKalamata olivesPaté di olive taggiasche
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 233 kcal 279 kcal
Fat 20 g 28.7 g
Saturated fat 3.3 g 4.5 g
Sugars 0 g 1.5 g
Salt 4 g 3.5 g
Fiber 13.3 g 3 g
Protein 0 g 2.1 g
Additives41
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kalamata olives has 16% fewer calories (233 kcal vs 279 kcal).
  • Kalamata olives has 30% less fat (20 g vs 28.7 g).
  • Kalamata olives has 26% less saturated fat (3.3 g vs 4.5 g).
  • Kalamata olives has no sugar, while Paté di olive taggiasche has 1.5 g.
  • Paté di olive taggiasche has 13% less salt (3.5 g vs 4 g).
  • Kalamata olives has 77% more fiber (13.3 g vs 3 g).
  • Paté di olive taggiasche has 100% more protein (2.1 g vs 0 g).
  • Paté di olive taggiasche is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Kalamata olives

Bringebær (55 %), sukker (24 %), vann (20 %), fortykningsmiddel (E 440). surhetsregulerende middel (E 330), konserveringsmiddel (E 202), fargestoff (E 120).

Paté di olive taggiasche

Olive taggiasche denocciolate 90% (Olive Taggiasche, sale), olio extra vergine di oliva da olive Taggiasche, correttore di acidità: acido citrico

FAQ

Which is healthier: Kalamata olives or Paté di olive taggiasche?

Overall, Kalamata olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kalamata olives has fewer calories: 233 kcal versus 279 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kalamata olives has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons