Kalamata olives vs Olives
Overall, Olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kalamata olives | Olives |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 233 kcal | 162 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 17.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.3 g | 3.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 4 g | 4.1 g |
| Fiber | 13.3 g | 2.1 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 1.1 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Olives has 30% fewer calories (162 kcal vs 233 kcal).
- Olives has 15% less fat (17.1 g vs 20 g).
- Kalamata olives has 84% more fiber (13.3 g vs 2.1 g).
- Olives has 100% more protein (1.1 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Kalamata olives
Bringebær (55 %), sukker (24 %), vann (20 %), fortykningsmiddel (E 440). surhetsregulerende middel (E 330), konserveringsmiddel (E 202), fargestoff (E 120).
Olives
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kalamata olives or Olives?
Overall, Olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Olives has fewer calories: 162 kcal versus 233 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kalamata olives has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.