Comparison
Paté di olive riviera biologiche vs Olives
Overall, Olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Paté di olive riviera biolog... | Olives |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 399 kcal | 162 kcal |
| Fat | 40.4 g | 17.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.5 g | 3.1 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2.8 g | 4.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 2.1 g |
| Protein | 1.7 g | 1.1 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Olives has 59% fewer calories (162 kcal vs 399 kcal).
- Olives has 58% less fat (17.1 g vs 40.4 g).
- Olives has 44% less saturated fat (3.1 g vs 5.5 g).
- Olives has no sugar, while Paté di olive riviera biologiche has 2 g.
- Paté di olive riviera biologiche has 32% less salt (2.8 g vs 4.1 g).
- Paté di olive riviera biologiche has 36% more protein (1.7 g vs 1.1 g).
Ingredients
Paté di olive riviera biologiche
Olive nere in salamoia snocciolate 90%, olio extra vergine di oliva biologico 9%, sale, correttore di acidità: acido citrico
Olives
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Paté di olive riviera biologiche or Olives?
Overall, Olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Olives has fewer calories: 162 kcal versus 399 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Olives has less sugar: 0 g versus 2 g per 100 g.