Kalamata olives vs Paté di olive riviera biologiche
Overall, Kalamata olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Kalamata olives
Paté di olive riviera biologiche
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kalamata olives | Paté di olive riviera biolog... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 233 kcal | 399 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 40.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.3 g | 5.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 4 g | 2.8 g |
| Fiber | 13.3 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 1.7 g |
| Additives | 4 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kalamata olives has 42% fewer calories (233 kcal vs 399 kcal).
- Kalamata olives has 50% less fat (20 g vs 40.4 g).
- Kalamata olives has 39% less saturated fat (3.3 g vs 5.5 g).
- Kalamata olives has no sugar, while Paté di olive riviera biologiche has 2 g.
- Paté di olive riviera biologiche has 30% less salt (2.8 g vs 4 g).
- Paté di olive riviera biologiche has 100% more protein (1.7 g vs 0 g).
- Paté di olive riviera biologiche is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Kalamata olives
Bringebær (55 %), sukker (24 %), vann (20 %), fortykningsmiddel (E 440). surhetsregulerende middel (E 330), konserveringsmiddel (E 202), fargestoff (E 120).
Paté di olive riviera biologiche
Olive nere in salamoia snocciolate 90%, olio extra vergine di oliva biologico 9%, sale, correttore di acidità: acido citrico
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kalamata olives or Paté di olive riviera biologiche?
Overall, Kalamata olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kalamata olives has fewer calories: 233 kcal versus 399 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kalamata olives has less sugar: 0 g versus 2 g per 100 g.