Comparison

Jambonneau de porc vs Jambonneau de porc confit

Overall, Jambonneau de porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientJambonneau de porcJambonneau de porc confit
Nutri-Score b d
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 130 kcal 182 kcal
Fat 3.4 g 11.1 g
Saturated fat 1.9 g 3.7 g
Sugars 0.6 g 0 g
Salt 0.5 g 1.8 g
Protein 20.4 g 18.4 g
Additives20
AllergensNone listedCelery, Fish, Milk, Mustard

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Jambonneau de porc has 29% fewer calories (130 kcal vs 182 kcal).
  • Jambonneau de porc has 69% less fat (3.4 g vs 11.1 g).
  • Jambonneau de porc has 49% less saturated fat (1.9 g vs 3.7 g).
  • Jambonneau de porc confit has no sugar, while Jambonneau de porc has 0.6 g.
  • Jambonneau de porc has 72% less salt (0.5 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Jambonneau de porc has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Jambonneau de porc confit is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Jambonneau de porc confit lists: Celery, Fish, Milk, Mustard.

Ingredients

Jambonneau de porc

Jarret de porc, couenne de porc, eau. sel. dextrose, sirop de glucose, aromes naturels, E301, E250. Porc origine FRANCE

Jambonneau de porc confit

Jarret de pore 95% (Origine France), vin blanc sec Armagnac, sel, poivre. Présence ou traces possibles de céréales contenent du gluten, produits à base de céréales, coufs, lait, fruits à coques, céleri, poissons et moutarde.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Jambonneau de porc or Jambonneau de porc confit?

Overall, Jambonneau de porc has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Jambonneau de porc has fewer calories: 130 kcal versus 182 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Jambonneau de porc confit has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons