Jambonneau vs Jambonneau cuit
Overall, Jambonneau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Jambonneau | Jambonneau cuit |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 139 kcal | 131 kcal |
| Fat | 6.5 g | 5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 1.9 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Jambonneau cuit has 23% less fat (5 g vs 6.5 g).
- Jambonneau has 26% less salt (1.4 g vs 1.9 g).
- Jambonneau has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Jambonneau
Jambonneau de porc 81%, eau, couenne de porc, gélatine de porc, sel, poivre.
Jambonneau cuit
Jambonneau de porc, sel, sirop de glucose, arômes naturels, antioxydant : érythorbate de sodium, conservateur : nitrite de sodium. Viande de porc origine France.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Jambonneau or Jambonneau cuit?
Overall, Jambonneau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Jambonneau cuit has fewer calories: 131 kcal versus 139 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Jambonneau has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.