JAMBON SEC AUVERGNE 9 mois IGP 400g FE - Massif LS (promo) vs Jambon de Vendée
Overall, Jambon de Vendée has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
JAMBON SEC AUVERGNE 9 mois IGP 400g FE - Massif LS (promo)
Jambon de Vendée
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | JAMBON SEC AUVERGNE 9 mois I... | Jambon de Vendée |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 262 kcal | 215 kcal |
| Fat | 15 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.8 g | 4.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 6.5 g | 4.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 29 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Jambon de Vendée has 18% fewer calories (215 kcal vs 262 kcal).
- Jambon de Vendée has 20% less fat (12 g vs 15 g).
- Jambon de Vendée has 24% less saturated fat (4.4 g vs 5.8 g).
- JAMBON SEC AUVERGNE 9 mois IGP 400g FE - Massif LS (promo) has 60% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Jambon de Vendée has 37% less salt (4.1 g vs 6.5 g).
- JAMBON SEC AUVERGNE 9 mois IGP 400g FE - Massif LS (promo) has 14% more protein (29 g vs 25 g).
Ingredients
JAMBON SEC AUVERGNE 9 mois IGP 400g FE - Massif LS (promo)
Not available.
Jambon de Vendée
Jambon de porc français, sel, eau de vie de vin, épices et aromates, dextrose, saccharose, arômes naturels, ferments, conservateurs : salpêtre.
FAQ
Which is healthier: JAMBON SEC AUVERGNE 9 mois IGP 400g FE - Massif LS (promo) or Jambon de Vendée?
Overall, Jambon de Vendée has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Jambon de Vendée has fewer calories: 215 kcal versus 262 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
JAMBON SEC AUVERGNE 9 mois IGP 400g FE - Massif LS (promo) has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.