Huile d'olive vierge extra vs Reiswaffeln VM Cocos
Overall, Huile d'olive vierge extra has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Huile d'olive vierge extra | Reiswaffeln VM Cocos |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 120 kcal | 513 kcal |
| Fat | 13.3 g | 27 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.1 g | 17 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 25 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.6 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 7.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Huile d'olive vierge extra has 77% fewer calories (120 kcal vs 513 kcal).
- Huile d'olive vierge extra has 51% less fat (13.3 g vs 27 g).
- Huile d'olive vierge extra has 87% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 17 g).
- Huile d'olive vierge extra has no sugar, while Reiswaffeln VM Cocos has 25 g.
- Reiswaffeln VM Cocos has 100% more fiber (3.6 g vs 0 g).
- Reiswaffeln VM Cocos has 100% more protein (7.8 g vs 0 g).
- Huile d'olive vierge extra has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Reiswaffeln VM Cocos lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Huile d'olive vierge extra
100% Huile d'olive vierge extra bio
Reiswaffeln VM Cocos
Vollmilchschokolade* 54 % (Rohrzucker*, Kakaobutter*, VOLLMILCHPULVER* 21 %, Kakaomasse*, Vanilleextrakt*), Vollkornreis* 40 %, Kokosraspeln* 6 % *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft Kann Spuren von Soja, Nüssen und Sesam enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Huile d'olive vierge extra or Reiswaffeln VM Cocos?
Overall, Huile d'olive vierge extra has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Huile d'olive vierge extra has fewer calories: 120 kcal versus 513 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Huile d'olive vierge extra has less sugar: 0 g versus 25 g per 100 g.