Comparison

Hot Cross Buns vs Graham de vel Pitat

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHot Cross BunsGraham de vel Pitat
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 251 kcal 235 kcal
Fat 2.1 g 2 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 0.4 g
Sugars 17.5 g 5.4 g
Salt 0.5 g 2.8 g
Fiber 4.2 g 5.2 g
Protein 7.7 g 9.6 g
Additives40
AllergensGluten, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Graham de vel Pitat has 69% less sugar (5.4 g vs 17.5 g).
  • Hot Cross Buns has 83% less salt (0.5 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Graham de vel Pitat has 19% more fiber (5.2 g vs 4.2 g).
  • Graham de vel Pitat has 20% more protein (9.6 g vs 7.7 g).
  • Hot Cross Buns has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Hot Cross Buns lists: Gluten, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Hot Cross Buns

Wheat Flour [Wheat Flour, Calcium Carbonate, Iron, Niacin, Thiamin], Moistened Mixed Fruits (25%) [Sultanas, Raisins, Currants, Water], Water, Mixed Peel (2%) [Orange Peel, Lemon Peel], Invert Sugar Syrup, Yeast, Wheat Gluten, Potato Dextrin, Wheat Protein, Palm Oil, Salt, Emulsifiers (Mono - and Di-Acetyl Tartaric Acid Esters of Mono - and Di-Glycerides of Fatty Acids, Mono - and Di-Glycerides of Fatty Acids), Palm Fat, Flavouring, Rapeseed Oil, Vegetable Fibre, Soya Flour, Flour Treatment Agent (Ascorbic Acid).

Graham de vel Pitat

faina neagra de grau, apa, drojdie, sare iodata, conservanti (acid sorbic, propionat de calciu)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Hot Cross Buns or Graham de vel Pitat?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Graham de vel Pitat has fewer calories: 235 kcal versus 251 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Graham de vel Pitat has less sugar: 5.4 g versus 17.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons