Comparison

Heidelbeeren vs Velouté courge butternut patate douce girolle

Overall, Heidelbeeren has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHeidelbeerenVelouté courge butternut pat...
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group 1 3
Calories 58 kcal 38 kcal
Fat 0.3 g 2.8 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.5 g
Sugars 10 g 1.9 g
Salt 0 g 0.5 g
Fiber 2.4 g 1.2 g
Protein 0.9 g 0.6 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedEggs, Peanuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Velouté courge butternut patate douce girolle has 34% fewer calories (38 kcal vs 58 kcal).
  • Heidelbeeren has 88% less fat (0.3 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Heidelbeeren has 94% less saturated fat (0 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Velouté courge butternut patate douce girolle has 81% less sugar (1.9 g vs 10 g).
  • Heidelbeeren has 98% less salt (0 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Heidelbeeren has 50% more fiber (2.4 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Heidelbeeren has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Heidelbeeren is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Velouté courge butternut patate douce girolle lists: Eggs, Peanuts.

Ingredients

Heidelbeeren

Heidelbeeren

Velouté courge butternut patate douce girolle

Courge butternut 40%, eau, patate douce 14%, girolle 6,2%, huile d'olive vierge extra 2,8%, échalote, sel, ail, poivre blanc. Produit élaboré dans un atelier qu ituilise: œuf, arachide.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Heidelbeeren or Velouté courge butternut patate douce girolle?

Overall, Heidelbeeren has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Velouté courge butternut patate douce girolle has fewer calories: 38 kcal versus 58 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Velouté courge butternut patate douce girolle has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 10 g per 100 g.

More comparisons