Comparison

Havervlokken Fibre Fit vs NATURE VALLEY Crunchy variety pack

Overall, Havervlokken Fibre Fit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 9 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHavervlokken Fibre FitNATURE VALLEY Crunchy variet...
Nutri-Score b d
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 367 kcal 465 kcal
Fat 6.7 g 17.8 g
Saturated fat 1.3 g 2.2 g
Sugars 6 g 26.8 g
Salt 1 g 0.8 g
Fiber 10.9 g 6.4 g
Protein 11.8 g 8.7 g
Additives03
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Havervlokken Fibre Fit has 21% fewer calories (367 kcal vs 465 kcal).
  • Havervlokken Fibre Fit has 62% less fat (6.7 g vs 17.8 g).
  • Havervlokken Fibre Fit has 41% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Havervlokken Fibre Fit has 78% less sugar (6 g vs 26.8 g).
  • Havervlokken Fibre Fit has 41% more fiber (10.9 g vs 6.4 g).
  • Havervlokken Fibre Fit has 26% more protein (11.8 g vs 8.7 g).
  • Havervlokken Fibre Fit has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Havervlokken Fibre Fit is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Havervlokken Fibre Fit

Flocons d'avoine

NATURE VALLEY Crunchy variety pack

Havermout en Canadese Ahornsiroop. Ingrediënten: volkoren HAVERMOUT (60%), suiker, plantaardige oliën (zonnebloem, koolzaad in wisselende verhoudingen), Canadese Ahornsiroop (2%), honing, natuurlijk aroma, zout, emulgator (lecithinen), rijsmiddel (natriumwaterstofcarbonaat), melasse

FAQ

Which is healthier: Havervlokken Fibre Fit or NATURE VALLEY Crunchy variety pack?

Overall, Havervlokken Fibre Fit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Havervlokken Fibre Fit has fewer calories: 367 kcal versus 465 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Havervlokken Fibre Fit has less sugar: 6 g versus 26.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons