Comparison

ISOSTAR High Protein S.Bar Hazelnoot vs Havervlokken Fibre Fit

Overall, Havervlokken Fibre Fit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientISOSTAR High Protein S.Bar H...Havervlokken Fibre Fit
Nutri-Score e b
NOVA group 4 1
Calories 385 kcal 367 kcal
Fat 10 g 6.7 g
Saturated fat 5 g 1.3 g
Sugars 38 g 6 g
Salt 0.6 g 1 g
Fiber — 10.9 g
Protein 25 g 11.8 g
Additives40
AllergensEggs, Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans, Blé, Lactosérum, Lait, Noisettes, ŒufNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Havervlokken Fibre Fit has 33% less fat (6.7 g vs 10 g).
  • Havervlokken Fibre Fit has 74% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 5 g).
  • Havervlokken Fibre Fit has 84% less sugar (6 g vs 38 g).
  • ISOSTAR High Protein S.Bar Hazelnoot has 45% less salt (0.6 g vs 1 g).
  • ISOSTAR High Protein S.Bar Hazelnoot has 53% more protein (25 g vs 11.8 g).
  • Havervlokken Fibre Fit has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Havervlokken Fibre Fit is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only ISOSTAR High Protein S.Bar Hazelnoot lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans, Blé, Lactosérum, Lait, Noisettes, Œuf.

Ingredients

ISOSTAR High Protein S.Bar Hazelnoot

Sirop de glucose, chocolat au _lait_ 20% (sucre, beurre de cacao, _lait_ écrémé, _lactosérum_, pâte de cacao, matière grasse de _lait_, émulsifiant: lécithines de _soja_, arôme), protéines de _lait_, _gluten_ de blé, stabilisant: sorbitols, sucre, blanc d'_œuf_, _lactosérum_, fructose, _noisettes_ torréfiées 2,5%, stabilisant: glycérol, huile de tournesol, fibres de betteraves, cacao maigre (émulsifiant,: lécithines de _soja_), sels de potassium de l'acide orthophosphorique, sel de calcium de l'acide orthophosphorique, arômes, vitamine C, B6, niacine, thiamine, riboflavine et E (_lactose_, protéines de _lait_)

Havervlokken Fibre Fit

Flocons d'avoine

FAQ

Which is healthier: ISOSTAR High Protein S.Bar Hazelnoot or Havervlokken Fibre Fit?

Overall, Havervlokken Fibre Fit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Havervlokken Fibre Fit has fewer calories: 367 kcal versus 385 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Havervlokken Fibre Fit has less sugar: 6 g versus 38 g per 100 g.

More comparisons