Comparison

Havervlokken Fibre Fit vs Haar Vitamines

Overall, Haar Vitamines has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHavervlokken Fibre FitHaar Vitamines
Nutri-Score b —
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 367 kcal 360 kcal
Fat 6.7 g 0 g
Saturated fat 1.3 g 0 g
Sugars 6 g 0 g
Salt 1 g 0.3 g
Fiber 10.9 g 0 g
Protein 11.8 g 0 g
Additives07
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Haar Vitamines has no fat, while Havervlokken Fibre Fit has 6.7 g.
  • Haar Vitamines has no saturated fat, while Havervlokken Fibre Fit has 1.3 g.
  • Haar Vitamines has no sugar, while Havervlokken Fibre Fit has 6 g.
  • Haar Vitamines has 70% less salt (0.3 g vs 1 g).
  • Havervlokken Fibre Fit has 100% more fiber (10.9 g vs 0 g).
  • Havervlokken Fibre Fit has 100% more protein (11.8 g vs 0 g).
  • Havervlokken Fibre Fit is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Havervlokken Fibre Fit

Flocons d'avoine

Haar Vitamines

Zoetstoffen (Maltitolstroop, Maltitol), Gezuiverd water, Calcium, Verdikkingsmiddel (Pectine), Vulmiddel (Natrium hexametafosfaat, Citroenzuur, Trinatriumcitraat), Vitamine C, Vitamine E, Smaakstoffen (DL-Appelzuur, Frambozen aroma, Blauwe bessen aroma), Glansmiddel (Carnaubawas, Plantaardige olie), Vitamine A, Zink, Vitamine B5, Vitamine D, Biotine, Jodium, Vitamine B6, Vitamine B12, Foliumzuur, Choline, Inositol, Kleurstoffen (Briljant blauw).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Havervlokken Fibre Fit or Haar Vitamines?

Overall, Haar Vitamines has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Haar Vitamines has fewer calories: 360 kcal versus 367 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Haar Vitamines has less sugar: 0 g versus 6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons