Havervlokken Fibre Fit vs Tagatesse
Overall, Tagatesse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Havervlokken Fibre Fit | Tagatesse |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 367 kcal | 216 kcal |
| Fat | 6.7 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 6 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 10.9 g | 60 g |
| Protein | 11.8 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tagatesse has 41% fewer calories (216 kcal vs 367 kcal).
- Tagatesse has no fat, while Havervlokken Fibre Fit has 6.7 g.
- Tagatesse has no saturated fat, while Havervlokken Fibre Fit has 1.3 g.
- Tagatesse has 92% less sugar (0.5 g vs 6 g).
- Tagatesse has no salt, while Havervlokken Fibre Fit has 1 g.
- Tagatesse has 82% more fiber (60 g vs 10.9 g).
- Havervlokken Fibre Fit has 100% more protein (11.8 g vs 0 g).
- Havervlokken Fibre Fit is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Havervlokken Fibre Fit
Flocons d'avoine
Tagatesse
Édulcorant (Isomalt), oligosaccharides (polydextrose), fibres alimentaires (inuline), édulcora (D-Tagatose (dérivé du lait**)), édulcorant (sucralose).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Havervlokken Fibre Fit or Tagatesse?
Overall, Tagatesse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tagatesse has fewer calories: 216 kcal versus 367 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tagatesse has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 6 g per 100 g.