Haringfilets in azijn met zoetstof vs Sursild
Overall, Haringfilets in azijn met zoetstof has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Haringfilets in azijn met zo... | Sursild |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 161 kcal | 215 kcal |
| Fat | 12 g | 8 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.1 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 25 g |
| Salt | 2.1 g | 2.8 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 13 g | 7.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Haringfilets in azijn met zoetstof has 25% fewer calories (161 kcal vs 215 kcal).
- Sursild has 33% less fat (8 g vs 12 g).
- Sursild has 51% less saturated fat (2 g vs 4.1 g).
- Haringfilets in azijn met zoetstof has 98% less sugar (0.6 g vs 25 g).
- Haringfilets in azijn met zoetstof has 25% less salt (2.1 g vs 2.8 g).
- Haringfilets in azijn met zoetstof has 44% more protein (13 g vs 7.3 g).
- Haringfilets in azijn met zoetstof has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Sursild lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Haringfilets in azijn met zoetstof
Not available.
Sursild
Marinert _sild_ (45%), sukker, løk (18%), vann, salt, eddik, pepper, aroma, korerveringsmiddel (natriumbenzoat).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Haringfilets in azijn met zoetstof or Sursild?
Overall, Haringfilets in azijn met zoetstof has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Haringfilets in azijn met zoetstof has fewer calories: 161 kcal versus 215 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Haringfilets in azijn met zoetstof has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 25 g per 100 g.