Harina integral trigo de espelta vs Harina de trigo de espelta panificable
Overall, Harina de trigo de espelta panificable has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Harina integral trigo de esp... | Harina de trigo de espelta p... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 332 kcal | 113 kcal |
| Fat | 2.6 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 14.2 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Harina de trigo de espelta panificable has 66% fewer calories (113 kcal vs 332 kcal).
- Harina de trigo de espelta panificable has 96% less fat (0.1 g vs 2.6 g).
- Harina de trigo de espelta panificable has 88% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.8 g).
- Harina de trigo de espelta panificable has 21% more protein (18 g vs 14.2 g).
Ingredients
Harina integral trigo de espelta
Not available.
Harina de trigo de espelta panificable
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Harina integral trigo de espelta or Harina de trigo de espelta panificable?
Overall, Harina de trigo de espelta panificable has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Harina de trigo de espelta panificable has fewer calories: 113 kcal versus 332 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Harina de trigo de espelta panificable has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.