Harina de trigo de espelta panificable vs Harina de trigo de espelta integral
Overall, Harina de trigo de espelta panificable has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Harina de trigo de espelta p... | Harina de trigo de espelta i... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 113 kcal | 344 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 2.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Harina de trigo de espelta panificable has 67% fewer calories (113 kcal vs 344 kcal).
- Harina de trigo de espelta panificable has 96% less fat (0.1 g vs 2.3 g).
- Harina de trigo de espelta panificable has 75% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
- Harina de trigo de espelta panificable has 75% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
- Harina de trigo de espelta panificable has 39% more protein (18 g vs 11 g).
Ingredients
Harina de trigo de espelta panificable
Not available.
Harina de trigo de espelta integral
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Harina de trigo de espelta panificable or Harina de trigo de espelta integral?
Overall, Harina de trigo de espelta panificable has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Harina de trigo de espelta panificable has fewer calories: 113 kcal versus 344 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Harina de trigo de espelta panificable has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.4 g per 100 g.