Comparison

Haricots rouges vs Hak Kleine Rode Kidneybonen

Overall, Hak Kleine Rode Kidneybonen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientHaricots rougesHak Kleine Rode Kidneybonen
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 95 kcal 103 kcal
Fat 0.8 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 0.1 g
Sugars 0.2 g 0.8 g
Salt 0.4 g 0.4 g
Fiber 6.4 g 8.1 g
Protein 7.8 g 7.7 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Hak Kleine Rode Kidneybonen has 38% less fat (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Haricots rouges has 75% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Hak Kleine Rode Kidneybonen has 21% more fiber (8.1 g vs 6.4 g).

Ingredients

Haricots rouges

Haricots rouges, eau, sel, antioxydant: calcium disodium EDTA. Traces éventuelles de sulfites, de lupins et de soja.

Hak Kleine Rode Kidneybonen

Petits haricots rouges, eau, sel.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Haricots rouges or Hak Kleine Rode Kidneybonen?

Overall, Hak Kleine Rode Kidneybonen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Haricots rouges has fewer calories: 95 kcal versus 103 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Haricots rouges has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons