Haricots rouges vs Haricots rouges au naturel
Overall, Haricots rouges has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Haricots rouges | Haricots rouges au naturel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 95 kcal | 111 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 2.5 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 6.4 g | — |
| Protein | 7.8 g | 7.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Haricots rouges has 14% fewer calories (95 kcal vs 111 kcal).
- Haricots rouges has 92% less sugar (0.2 g vs 2.5 g).
- Haricots rouges has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Haricots rouges
Haricots rouges, eau, sel, antioxydant: calcium disodium EDTA. Traces éventuelles de sulfites, de lupins et de soja.
Haricots rouges au naturel
Haricots rouges*, eau, sel de Guérande. *Produit issu de l'agriculture biologique
FAQ
Which is healthier: Haricots rouges or Haricots rouges au naturel?
Overall, Haricots rouges has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Haricots rouges has fewer calories: 95 kcal versus 111 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Haricots rouges has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.