Haricots rouges au naturel vs Hak Kleine Rode Kidneybonen
Overall, Hak Kleine Rode Kidneybonen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Haricots rouges au naturel | Hak Kleine Rode Kidneybonen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 111 kcal | 103 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | — | 8.1 g |
| Protein | 7.5 g | 7.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hak Kleine Rode Kidneybonen has 38% less fat (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Hak Kleine Rode Kidneybonen has 75% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
- Hak Kleine Rode Kidneybonen has 68% less sugar (0.8 g vs 2.5 g).
- Hak Kleine Rode Kidneybonen has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Haricots rouges au naturel
Haricots rouges*, eau, sel de Guérande. *Produit issu de l'agriculture biologique
Hak Kleine Rode Kidneybonen
Petits haricots rouges, eau, sel.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Haricots rouges au naturel or Hak Kleine Rode Kidneybonen?
Overall, Hak Kleine Rode Kidneybonen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hak Kleine Rode Kidneybonen has fewer calories: 103 kcal versus 111 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Hak Kleine Rode Kidneybonen has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.