Comparison

Grüne Oliven mit Knoblauch vs Aceituna rellena de anchoa

Overall, Aceituna rellena de anchoa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientGrüne Oliven mit KnoblauchAceituna rellena de anchoa
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 143 kcal 141 kcal
Fat 13.3 g 15 g
Saturated fat 2 g 2.5 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0 g
Salt 4.3 g 3.5 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 1.4 g 1.4 g
Additives34
AllergensNone listedFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Grüne Oliven mit Knoblauch has 11% less fat (13.3 g vs 15 g).
  • Grüne Oliven mit Knoblauch has 20% less saturated fat (2 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Aceituna rellena de anchoa has no sugar, while Grüne Oliven mit Knoblauch has 0.5 g.
  • Aceituna rellena de anchoa has 19% less salt (3.5 g vs 4.3 g).
  • Aceituna rellena de anchoa has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Grüne Oliven mit Knoblauch is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Aceituna rellena de anchoa lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Grüne Oliven mit Knoblauch

49% olives vertes, eau, 8% ail, sel, correcteur d'acidité: acide lactique; antioxydants: acide citrique, acide ascorbique. Traces éventuelles d'amandes.

Aceituna rellena de anchoa

Aceituna manzanilla verde, relleno 6% (anchoa, agua, estabilizador: alginato sódico), sal, potenciador de sabor: glutamato monosódico, acidulante: ácido citrico, antioxidante: ácido L-ascórbico.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Grüne Oliven mit Knoblauch or Aceituna rellena de anchoa?

Overall, Aceituna rellena de anchoa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Aceituna rellena de anchoa has fewer calories: 141 kcal versus 143 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Aceituna rellena de anchoa has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons