Comparison

Ground Beef 93/7 vs Naudan jauheliha

Overall, Ground Beef 93/7 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Better choice

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Ground Beef 93/7	Naudan jauheliha
Nutri-Score	b	c
NOVA group	1	1
Calories	152 kcal	170 kcal
Fat	7.1 g	10 g
Saturated fat	2.7 g	4.5 g
Sugars	0 g	0 g
Salt	0.2 g	0.1 g
Fiber	0 g	—
Protein	20.5 g	20 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Ground Beef 93/7 has 11% fewer calories (152 kcal vs 170 kcal).
Ground Beef 93/7 has 29% less fat (7.1 g vs 10 g).
Ground Beef 93/7 has 40% less saturated fat (2.7 g vs 4.5 g).
Ground Beef 93/7 has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Ground Beef 93/7

Organic Beef.

Naudan jauheliha

Naudanliha 100 %.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Ground Beef 93/7 or Naudan jauheliha?

Overall, Ground Beef 93/7 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Ground Beef 93/7 has fewer calories: 152 kcal versus 170 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Ground Beef 93/7 has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Ground Beef 93/7 vs Steak mince less than 5%... Steak mince less than 5%... vs Naudan jauheliha Ground Beef 93/7 vs Viande hachée pur boeuf,... Ground Beef 93/7 vs British Beef Lean Steak... Ground Beef 93/7 vs British Beef Lean Steak... Ground Beef 93/7 vs Viande hachée pur boeuf,... Ground Beef 93/7 vs 100% Grass Fed & Finishe... Viande hachée pur boeuf,... vs Naudan jauheliha